Call To Begin A Consultation
Prior Lake952-226-2015
View Our Practice Areas

SD lawmakers looking to move forward with shared parenting bill

In a previous post, our blog discussed how a growing number of lawmakers, parents and family advocacy groups are calling on state legislatures to enact so-called shared-parenting laws that -- with the exception of cases of involving substance abuse or domestic violence -- would essentially mandate that children of divorce spend equal time with both parents.

Interestingly, lawmakers in neighboring South Dakota attempted to introduce just such a shared parenting bill last year only to see their proposal roundly defeated due to concerns from fellow lawmakers that it was perhaps overreaching.  

"The way the language was crafted last year, was pretty strong," said Sen. Corey Brown, (R-Gettysburg). "It would have forced shared parenting situations onto a couple or child, even if that's not what one of the parties wanted."

In recent developments, lawmakers in the Mount Rushmore State are once again attempting to amend existing child custody laws to account for shared parenting concerns. This time, however, the proposed legislation is taking a more measured approach. 

The 2014 version of the Shared Parenting Bill, co-sponsored by Sen. Dan Lederman (R-Dakota Dunes) and Rep. Charles Hoffman (R-Eureka), wouldn't mandate 50-50 splits when it comes to joint custody, but rather would create guidelines for judges to consider when making determinations concerning joint physical custody. Specifically, it would enable judges to consider such new factors as appropriate housing, suitability, and parental stability to name only a few.

"This bill makes it a little more clear as to what judges should look for in determining the time split between mothers and fathers," said Lederman, the Assistant Majority Leader of the South Dakota Senate.

This year's version of the bill came about as a direct result of the collaborative efforts of lawmakers, father's rights advocates and the state bar association. Interestingly, the state bar association actually came out against last year's version of the bill, arguing that it could serve to engender greater conflict among divorced parents.

For their part, both Lederman and Hoffman are confident that the proposed bill will pass this session as several lawmakers have already pledged their support.

Stay tuned for updates ...

Those with questions or concerns regarding child custody, child support or other divorce-related matters here in Minnesota, should strongly consider consulting with an experienced attorney who can outline your options and enforce your rights. 

Source: The Capital Journal, "Lawmakers set to introduce child custody bill," Joel Ebert, Jan. 21, 2014; USA Today, "Shared parenting could be new divorce outcome," Jonathan Ellis, Jan. 27, 2014

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Email Us For A Response

We Can Help Ask us how - please call our family law offices at 612-200-2822 or fill out the form below to arrange a consultation.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Offices Conveniently located in Minneapolis and Prior Lake
  • Minneapolis Office
    2100 Fifth Street Towers
    100 South Fifth Street
    Minneapolis, MN 55402

    Toll Free: 800-219-0858
    Phone: 612-200-2822
    Fax: 612-605-0968
    Minneapolis Law Office Map

    Prior Lake Office
    14093 Commerce Avenue
    Prior Lake, MN 55372

    Toll Free: 800-219-0858
    Phone: 952-314-2617
    Phone: 952-226-2015
    Fax: 612-605-0968
    Map & Directions

  • Minneapolis Office Map
    • VISA
  • Prior Office Map